Skip to main content



Child-Maltreatment-Research-L (CMRL) List Serve

Database of Past CMRL Messages

Welcome to the database of past Child-Maltreatment-Research-L (CMRL) list serve messages. The table below contains all past CMRL messages (text only, no attachments) from Nov. 20, 1996 - March 6, 2018 and is updated quarterly.

Instructions: Postings are listed for browsing with the newest messages first. Click on the linked ID number to see a message. You can search the author, subject, message ID, and message content fields by entering your criteria into this search box:

Message ID: 9629
Date: 2014-04-16

Author:Finkelhor, David

Subject:RE: CPS response time and recurrence

Could you give us that DB Marshall 2006 citation. I couldn’t find it. David Finkelhor Crimes against Children Research Center Family Research Laboratory Department of Sociology, University of New Hampshire Durham, NH 03824 Tel 603 862-2761* Fax 603 862-1122 email: david.finkelhor@unh.edu http://www.unh.edu/ccrc/ http://www.unh.edu/frl/ 2014 International Family Violence and Child Victimization Research Conference July 13-15, Portsmouth, NH Abstract submission deadline: March 7, 2014 https://cola.unh.edu/frl/call-abstracts My new book is now available. To see more or order it, click on the cover below. ******************************************************* From: bounce-114499983-6832158@list.cornell.edu [mailto:bounce-114499983-6832158@list.cornell.edu] On Behalf Of Gail Goodman Sent: Tuesday, April 15, 2014 6:45 PM To: Child Maltreatment Researchers Subject: CPS response time and recurrence Dear Child Maltreatment Researchers, Would any of you know of any reports or statistics relevant to the issues below? I would be grateful if you can provide any citations or guidance. We have the Marshall report, but are not finding much else on point. Hopefully, more information than that exists. Thank you! When a California county receives a report of child abuse or neglect, and it is determined that an investigation is necessary, by law the social worker has to respond (i.e., make face-to-face contact) either immediately or within 10 days, depending on the level of safety. A 2006 article by David Marshall from Washington states that lower rates of victim recurrence are significantly associated with a lower number of days between receipt of referral and the initial face-to-face contact with the alleged victims. Are there additional case studies, articles, or literature that show the connection between social worker response time (how long it takes to respond after the report is made) and recurrence (subsequent reports of abuse/neglect)? Are there documented benefits to beginning child abuse investigations on or near the date the report is received? Sincerely, Gail -- Gail S. Goodman Distinguished Professor and Director, Center for Public Policy Research President, Division 7 (Developmental Psychology) of the American Psychological Association Department of Psychology University of California 1 Shields Avenue Davis, CA 95616 e-mail: ggoodman@ucdavis.edu phone: 530-752-6981 fax: 530-752-2087

Could you give us that DB Marshall 2006 citation. I couldn’t find it. David Finkelhor Crimes against Children Research Center Family Research Laboratory Department of Sociology, University of New Hampshire Durham, NH 03824 Tel 603 862-2761* Fax 603 862-1122 email: david.finkelhorunh.edu http://www.unh.edu/ccrc/ http://www.unh.edu/frl/ 2014 International Family Violence and Child Victimization Research Conference July 13-15, Portsmouth, NH Abstract submission deadline: March 7, 2014 https://cola.unh.edu/frl/call-abstracts My new book is now available. To see more or order it, click on the cover below. ******************************************************* From: bounce-114499983-6832158list.cornell.edu [mailto:bounce-114499983-6832158list.cornell.edu] On Behalf Of Gail Goodman Sent: Tuesday, April 15, 2014 6:45 PM To: Child Maltreatment Researchers Subject: CPS response time and recurrence Dear Child Maltreatment Researchers, Would any of you know of any reports or statistics relevant to the issues below? I would be grateful if you can provide any citations or guidance. We have the Marshall report, but are not finding much else on point. Hopefully, more information than that exists. Thank you! When a California county receives a report of child abuse or neglect, and it is determined that an investigation is necessary, by law the social worker has to respond (i.e., make face-to-face contact) either immediately or within 10 days, depending on the level of safety. A 2006 article by David Marshall from Washington states that lower rates of victim recurrence are significantly associated with a lower number of days between receipt of referral and the initial face-to-face contact with the alleged victims. Are there additional case studies, articles, or literature that show the connection between social worker response time (how long it takes to respond after the report is made) and recurrence (subsequent reports of abuse/neglect)? Are there documented benefits to beginning child abuse investigations on or near the date the report is received? Sincerely, Gail -- Gail S. Goodman Distinguished Professor and Director, Center for Public Policy Research President, Division 7 (Developmental Psychology) of the American Psychological Association Department of Psychology University of California 1 Shields Avenue Davis, CA 95616 e-mail: ggoodmanucdavis.edu phone: 530-752-6981 fax: 530-752-2087