Hello, I would suggest reading the below article regarding the Matthew Eappen case: Am J Forensic Med Pathol 1999 Mar;20(1):17-21 Shaken baby syndrome and the death of Matthew Eappen: a forensic pathologist's response. Plunkett J Regina Medical Center, and Minnesota Regional Coroner's Office, Hastings 55033, USA. Subdural hemorrhage, retinal hemorrhage, and cerebral edema have been considered diagnostic for a "shaken infant" since the syndrome was described almost 30 years ago. However, the specificity of these findings has been disputed by defense witnesses in recent U.S. criminal prosecutions. This review examines the scientific basis for the shaken baby syndrome. I would also be interested to know what others think about this article. Det. John J. Baeza Chair, Ethics Committee Academy of Behavioral Profiling http://www.profiling.org/ RozPal@xxxxxxx wrote: > I am working with Michigan's Children's Trust Fund to determine the incidence > of Shaken Baby Syndrome in our state. What descriptions do > researchers/clinicians use to define SBS? This includes guidelines/criteria > used to determine if a case is indeed SBS which could greatly aid our > research. I appreciate your attention and wish everyone a safe and happy > holiday season. > > Vince Palusci MD > DeVos Children's Hospital > Michigan State University
[ Home |
About NDACAN | Datasets |
User Support |
Contribute Data |
Summer Research Institute ]
[ CMRL List Serve | Bibliography
| Measures Index |
Useful Links | Search ]
Copyright © 1996-2012 National Data Archive on Child Abuse and Neglect