Re: Postings on the listserv

["Dick Schoech" <schoech@xxxxxxx>]

Looks like a blantant violation of copyright laws as all messages are
copyrighted and the property of the owner.  CPSWatch understands
copyright as all their stuff says it is copyrighted.  If messages from
this listserv are quoted without permission, I would think that Cornell
would write a strong letter of warning or the owner of the messages
quoted should write the letter and get the stuff removed.  Maybe Cornell
should see this copyright violation as a fund raiser and sue for
damages.
-- 
Dick Schoech <mailto:schoech@xxxxxxx>
U of  TX at Arlington
Box 19129, 211 S. Cooper, Arl TX 76019-0129
http://www.uta.edu/cussn/

"Kemp, Susan" wrote:
> 
> http://www.cpswatch.com/
> 
> Susan Kemp
> AM4030@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> (518)473-1085
> or
> SusanKemp@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Hannah Renfro [mailto:hlrenfro@xxxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 03, 2000 5:43 AM
> To: Child Maltreatment Researchers
> Subject: RE: Postings on the listserv
> 
> What is the website address?
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-CHILD-MALTREATMENT-RESEARCH-L@xxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:owner-CHILD-MALTREATMENT-RESEARCH-L@xxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of
> BRubin525@xxxxxxx
> Sent: Tuesday, May 02, 2000 11:10 PM
> To: Child Maltreatment Researchers
> Subject: Re: Postings on the listserv
> 
> A note of warning to people who post on this Listserv.  There is a Website
> called CPS Watch which takes letters from the Listserv, quotes the letter
> totally out of context and then posts it on their website with glaring
> headlines.  They apparently are an organization that feels that CPS is
> abusive and needs to be watched carefully. I accidentally ended up on their
> site and found that a letter I had written on the Listserv was the "headline
> article" and was totally fashioned to support their somewhat radical
> opinion.
>  It came as a bit of a surpise.