[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: ISO recent refs on children's sexual behavior and alleged CSA
<x-html>
<html>
<body>
I am. We have always viewed Friedrich's work as definitive, but it
was recently suggested that there is something else out there with
different findings.<br><br>
Thanks for responding.<br><br>
Lyn R. Greenberg Ph.D.<br>
12401 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 303<br>
Los Angeles, CA 90025<br><br>
(310) 399-3684<br>
(310) 399-7154 - fax<br><br>
THIS MESSAGE IS INTENDED ONLY FOR THE USE OF THE INDIVIDUAL OR ENTITY TO
WHICH IT IS ADDRESSED AND MAY CONTAIN INFORMATION THAT IS PRIVILEGED,
CONFIDENTIAL AND/OR EXEMPT FROM DISCLOSURE UNDER APPLICABLE LAW. IF
THE READER OF THIS MESSAGE IS NOT THE INTENDED RECIPIENT, YOU ARE HEREBY
NOTIFIED THAT ANY COPYING, DISTRIBUTION OR DISSEMINATION OF THIS
INFORMATION IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED. IF YOU HAVE RECEIVED THIS
COMMUNICATION IN ERROR, PLEASE NOTIFY US IMMEDIATELY AND RETURN THE
ORIGINAL COMMUNICATION TO THE ADDRESS ABOVE VIA U.S. MAIL.
THANK YOU. IF THIS MESSAGE IS BEING SENT BY EMAIL AND CONTAINS
PRIVILEDGED COMMUNICATION, IT IS BASED ON THE CONSENT OF CLIENT OR
COUNSEL TO EMAIL COMMUNICATION, WITH FULL KNOWLEDGE THAT THIS MESSAGE IS
NOT ENCRYPTED AND THAT ANY SECURITY RISKS WHICH APPLY TO OTHER EMAIL
MESSAGES MAY BE APPLICABLE IN THIS INSTANCE. <br><br>
At 07:46 AM 12/17/2003, you wrote:<br>
<blockquote type=cite class=cite cite>Dr. Greenberg:<br>
I'm sure you are privy to the 1998 Mayo Clinic Report by Friedrich, et
al:<br>
<br>
<a href="http://www.pediatrics.org/cgi/content/abstract/101/4/e9";>http://www.pediatrics.org/cgi/content/abstract/101/4/e9</a><br>
<br>
<br>
In a message dated 12/17/2003 10:23:46 AM Eastern Standard Time,
lrgreenberg@earthlink.net writes:<br>
<dl>
<dd><font face="arial">I'm in search of recent references on children's
sexual behavior (including masturbation) and its use as an indicator in
cases of alleged CSA.. I'm interested in anything anyone might have on
how frequently this indicator is used, as well as anything new on
validity of this or any other specific behavior as an indicator of
CSA. I think I have most of the stuff before 2000, but if I've
missed anything recent and any of you have favorite references to share,
I'd be most grateful.</font><br><br>
</dl> <br>
<font face="arial" size=2>Dean Tong, Forensic Consultant<br>
10246 Hunters Haven Boulevard<br>
Riverview, Florida 33569<br>
813-671-4190, Ph/Fax<br>
813-417-5362, Cell<br>
813-278-8356, National Pager<br>
1-800-854-0735, Book/Interview Hotline<br>
<a href="http://abuse-excuse.com/";>abuse-excuse.com</a></font></blockquote>
<x-sigsep><p></x-sigsep>
<font face="BernhardMod BT" size=4>Lyn R. Greenberg Ph.D.<br>
12401 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 303<br>
Los Angeles, CA 90025<br><br>
310-399-3684<br>
fax 310-399-7154<br><br>
</font><font size=1>THIS MESSAGE IS INTENDED ONLY FOR THE USE OF THE
INDIVIDUAL OR ENTITY TO WHICH IT IS ADDRESSED AND MAY CONTAIN INFORMATION
THAT IS PRIVILEGED, CONFIDENTIAL AND/OR EXEMPT FROM DISCLOSURE UNDER
APPLICABLE LAW. IF THE READER OF THIS MESSAGE IS NOT THE INTENDED
RECIPIENT, YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED THAT ANY COPYING, DISTRIBUTION OR
DISSEMINATION OF THIS INFORMATION IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED. IF YOU
HAVE RECEIVED THIS COMMUNICATION IN ERROR, PLEASE NOTIFY US IMMEDIATELY
AND RETURN THE ORIGINAL COMMUNICATION TO THE ADDRESS ABOVE VIA U.S.
MAIL. THANK YOU. IF THIS MESSAGE IS BEING SENT BY EMAIL
AND CONTAINS PRIVILEDGED COMMUNICATION, IT IS BASED ON THE CONSENT OF
CLIENT OR COUNSEL TO EMAIL COMMUNICATION, WITH FULL KNOWLEDGE THAT THIS
MESSAGE IS NOT ENCRYPTED AND THAT ANY SECURITY RISKS WHICH APPLY TO OTHER
EMAIL MESSAGES MAY BE APPLICABLE IN THIS INSTANCE.</font> </body>
</html>
</x-html>