[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Methodological and Statistical Issues in the Study of Child Abuse Effects
<x-html>
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
<TITLE>Message</TITLE>
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.2800.1264" name=GENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV><SPAN class=620555705-29102003>Here are some articles that address some of
these issues</SPAN></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=620555705-29102003></SPAN> </DIV><SPAN
class=620555705-29102003><SPAN
style="FONT-SIZE: 12pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Times New Roman'; mso-fareast-font-family: 'Times New Roman'; mso-ansi-language: EN-US; mso-fareast-language: EN-US; mso-bidi-language: AR-SA">
<P class=MsoNormal style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt; TEXT-INDENT: 0.5in">Haugaard, J.
J. (2000). The challenge of defining child sexual abuse. <U>American
Psychologist, 55</U>, 1036-1039.</P>
<P class=MsoNormal style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt; TEXT-INDENT: 0.5in">Haugaard, J.
J., & Emery, R. E. (1989). Methodological issues in child sexual abuse
research.</P>
<P class=MsoNormal style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt; TEXT-INDENT: 0.5in"><SPAN
style="LETTER-SPACING: -0.15pt; mso-bidi-font-size: 10.0pt">Dallam, S. J.,
Gleaves, D., </SPAN>Cepeda-Benito, A., Silberg, J. L., Kraemer, H. C., &
Spiegel, D.<SPAN style="LETTER-SPACING: -0.15pt; mso-bidi-font-size: 10.0pt">
(2001). The effects </SPAN>of childhood sexual abuse: Comment on Rind,
Tromovitch and Bauserman (1998). <I
style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal">Psychological Bulletin</I>, 127(6),
715-733.</P>
<P class=MsoNormal style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt; LINE-HEIGHT: 24pt"><SPAN
class=620555705-29102003></SPAN>S<SPAN class=620555705-29102003>tephanie
Dallam</SPAN><BR style="mso-special-character: line-break"></P></SPAN></SPAN>
<BLOCKQUOTE dir=ltr
style="PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV class=OutlookMessageHeader lang=en-us dir=ltr align=left><FONT
face=Tahoma size=2>-----Original Message-----<BR><B>From:</B>
owner-CHILD-MALTREATMENT-RESEARCH-L@cornell.edu
[mailto:owner-CHILD-MALTREATMENT-RESEARCH-L@cornell.edu] <B>On Behalf Of
</B>Tracey & Marion Burke<BR><B>Sent:</B> Tuesday, October 28, 2003 10:16
AM<BR><B>To:</B> Child Maltreatment Researchers<BR><B>Subject:</B>
Methodological and Statistical Issues in the Study of Child Abuse
Effects<BR><BR></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>To all: </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>I am interested in locating literature that
examines the methodological and statistical issues in the study of child abuse
effects, particularly child sexual abuse effects. I would be grateful for
any references of articles that discuss and critique the methods of sampling,
research design, data collection, instruments used, statistical analyses and
other relevant research issues in the child abuse literature. I am aware of
Briere's 1992 article, but was hoping to find something more recent. Any
suggestions are welcomed. Thanks.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Marion Burke</DIV>
<DIV>PhD Learner</DIV>
<DIV>Harold Abel School of Psychology</DIV>
<DIV>Capella University</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Briere, J. (1992). Methodological issues in the study of sexual abuse
effects. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 60 (2), 196-203.</DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial
size=2></FONT> </DIV></FONT></DIV></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>
</x-html>