NDACAN Logo

National Data Archive on Child Abuse and Neglect -Title Banner
RE: Early recognition of seriousness
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: Early recognition of seriousness



At the same time, continuous (as opposed to discrete, stage-based) measures
of readiness to change have shown utility in predicting retention and
outcome in treatment, even after controlling for other predictors like SES.
For a review, see:

	Carey, K.B., Purnine, D.M., Maisto, S.A., & Carey, M.P. (1999).  Assessing
readiness to change substance abuse:  A critical review of instruments.
Clinical Psychology:  Research and Practice, 6, 245-266.

___________________________________
Steven J. Ondersma, Ph.D.
Assistant Professor--Research
Merrill-Palmer Institute
Wayne State University
71 E. Ferry Ave.
Detroit, MI  48202
Office:  (313) 872-2706
Fax:  (313) 875-0947
S.Ondersma@xxxxxxxxx
www.mpi.wayne.edu



-----Original Message-----
From: owner-CHILD-MALTREATMENT-RESEARCH-L@xxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-CHILD-MALTREATMENT-RESEARCH-L@xxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of
Julia H. Littell
Sent: Monday, May 14, 2001 10:55 AM
To: Child Maltreatment Researchers
Subject: Re: Early recognition of seriousness


Bill, I think you're right. Although the stages of change have been widely
studied in relation to a number of problem behaviors in health psychology
(e.g., smoking cessation, suncreen use, substance abuse) and mental health,
the evidence for discrete stages of change is very shakey even in those
fields. A review of the empirical evidence for stages of change (by Heather
Girvin and me) is in press in Behavior Modification.

At 12:57 PM 5/11/2001 -0700, you wrote:
>It was my understanding that there is little or no
>evidence to support stages of change in a social work
>setting.  Is this not true?
>
>Bill
>
>
>--- DSWLFSU@xxxxxxx wrote:
>> Two thoughts occur to me about this:
>> 1) I think there is a great need to build into
>> assessments and subsequent
>> family work the Prochaska/diClemente model of change
>> which i think isn't as
>> central to practice as it should be. There's a
>> summary of this work in the
>> Reader accompanying the new Framework
>> 2) I believe that all case files should have a
>> Critical Incident File at the
>> front of the file so that all incidents of note can
>> be put down and this,
>> freed from all the vast accumulation of detail that
>> files inevitably gather,
>> can give a readily available overview of the pattern
>> of events. A particular
>> inquiry into a child death in Sheffield a few years
>> ago argued this point
>> very persuasively.
>>
>> David Saltiel
>> Service Manager
>> West Leeds Family Service Units
>> Tel: 0113-275-7600
>> email: dswlfsu@xxxxxxx
>>
>
>
>__________________________________________________
>Do You Yahoo!?
>Yahoo! Auctions - buy the things you want at great prices
>http://auctions.yahoo.com/
>
>



[ Home | About NDACAN | Datasets | User Support | Contribute Data | Summer Research Institute ]
[ CMRL List Serve | Bibliography | Measures Index | Useful Links | Search ]

Copyright © 1996-2012 National Data Archive on Child Abuse and Neglect