I would refer you to work by the Munchausen by Proxy taskforce of APSAC which published definitional guidelines in 1998 in the Advisor. MBP is both a psychiatric (in the parent) and a pediatric (in the child victim) disorder. The correct current DSM-IV diagnostic category is Factitious Disorder Not Otherwise Specified - 300.19, see DSM-IV, p. 475). The definitional paper admonishes professionals to be careful and NOT use any form of "profile" particularly "profile " in the legal sense to identify this disorder. The disorder involves the identification of child abuse by illness falsification (exaggeration, fabrication or inducement of illness) and the diagnosis of factitious disorder by proxy in the parent perpetrator. The first concern is the presence of child abuse by illness falsification which does not require psychiatric examination of the parent to identify. Evaluation should be carefully approached with the following in mind: "PRELIMINARY RECOMMENDATIONS: Pediatricians and other health care personnel should: 1) be alert to the possibility of pediatric condition falsification and familiar with the many possible presentations in the child. 2) engage in a careful review of the past medical history of the child to include all available past records. 3) request assistance from pediatric or other professionals with expertise in diagnosing pediatric condition falsification and factitious disorder by proxy 4) be fully versed in the expected presentation, course, treatment efficacy, and prognosis of the child's disorder 5) obtain external verification of as many items as possible provided in the history by the caregiver. When psychological evaluations are recommended in these cases the mental health professional involved should: 1) be experienced with the diagnosis of factitious disorder by proxy. 2) have access to as much medical information on the child and family as is possible. 3) thoroughly understand the diagnosis of child abuse by illness condition falsification. 4) obtain external verification of as many items as possible provided in the history by the caregiver." The taskforce recommends that the word "syndrome" be removed from the terminology used to describe this disorder because of the differences in the way the term is applied in the medical and the legal communities. For further information here are the references referred to by the taskforce. APSAC can provide copies of the definitional paper (Ayoub, C., Alexander, R., Beck, D., Bursch, B., Feldman, K., Libow, J., Sanders, M., Schreier, H., & Yorker, B. Definitional issues in Munchausen by Proxy, The APSAC Advisor, 1998, 11:1, 7-10). REFERENCES Asher, R. 1951. Munchausen's syndrome. Lancet, i, 339-341. Alexander, R., smith, W., & Stevenson, R. (1990). Serial Munhausen by Proxy. Pediatrics, 86(4):581-585. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition. Washington D.C., American Psychiatric Association, 1994. Bools, C., Neale, B., & Meadow, R. (1994). Munchausen syndrome by proxy: A Study of Psychopathology. Child Abuse and Neglect, 18, (9), pp. 773 - 788. Kinscherff, R., & Famularo, R. (1991). Extreme Munchausen Syndrome by Proxy" The Case for Termination of Parental Rights. Juvenile & Family Court Journal, pp. 41 - 53. Libow, J. & Schreier, H. (1986). Three forms of factitious illness. When is it Munchausen by proxy? American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 56: 602-661. McClure, R.J., Davis, P.M., Meadow, S.R. & Sibert, J.B. 1996. Epidemiology of Munchausen syndrome by proxy on accidental suffocation. Archives of Disease of Childhood, 75:57, . McGuire, T.L., Feldman, K.W. (1989) Psychologic morbidity of children subjected to Munchausen syndrome by proxy. Pediatrics, 83, (2), 289 - 292. Meadow, R.. 1993. False allegations of abuse and Munchausen syndrome by proxy. Archives of Disease in Childhood, 68, 444-447. Meadow, R. 1977. Munchausen by proxy: The hinterland of child abuse. Lancet, ii, 343-345. Schreier, H.A. (1997). Factitious presentation of psychiatric disorder by proxy. Child Psychology and Psychiatry Review, 108-115. Schreier, H.A., 1996. Repeated false allegations of sexual abuse presenting to sheriffs: When is it Munchausen by proxy? Child Abuse and Neglect, 20:10, 985-991. Rosenberg, D. 1987. Web of deceit: a literature review of Munchausen syndrome by proxy, Child Abuse and Neglect. 11:547-563. On Fri, 16 Feb 2001 18:32:54 -0800 Elizabeth Charuvastra <lizch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I agree that we are debating terminology in the case of Munchausen Syndrome > by Proxy. I don't see how a definition as broad as this can be considered a > syndrome, however it is increasingly being used as a "diagnosis" and a whole > cottage industry seems to be growing up around it. Juvenile courts seek > expert witnesses in the syndrome and families who are labeled by the medical > profession with MSP find it difficult to defend themselves becasue of the > very loose use of the profile. I don't know what the solution might be. > Perhaps more education of the medical profession or abandoning the use of > the term altogether. > > Elizabeth Charuvastra RN. > ---------------------- Catherine Ayoub, Ed.D. Associate Professor Harvard Graduate School of Education & Harvard Medical School Larsen Hall, Rm. 711, Appian Way Cambridge, Ma. 02138 617-496-1183 Catherine_Ayoub@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[ Home |
About NDACAN | Datasets |
User Support |
Contribute Data |
Summer Research Institute ]
[ CMRL List Serve | Bibliography
| Measures Index |
Useful Links | Search ]
Copyright © 1996-2012 National Data Archive on Child Abuse and Neglect