bill higgins wrote: > Although others are perhaps more skilled in research > methodology, the best friend approach seems > problematic. Yes, it is pragmatic. Unfortunately, > kids select friends for many reasons. Although they > may match on SES, they are likely to differ > (significantly) on many other dimensions. We often > select friends to complement (rather than mirror) our > own personalities. Therefore, it might not prove to > be the best control. I would personal tend to fear the opposite, that 'best friends' have too much in common. The reason for this is that there will likely also be a greater equality in the properties being measured, as well as the background properties we want to get rid of. Best friends will influence each other quite a bit, and be chosen among people with similar habits and a similar look on life. Thus a child who is not interested in learning and because of that gets low grades, will tend to get a best friend who also prefers other things and is not the brightest in schoolwork. A child who is being depressed or otherwise not feeling well will probably have an effect on his/her best friend who will also feel slightly worse. -- Andre Engels, engels@xxxxxxxxxx Telephone: +31(0)6-11181398 (GSM) http://www.win.tue.nl/~engels/index_en.html PGP Public key: see http://www.win.tue.nl/~engels/pgp.asc If we don't believe in freedom of expression for people we despise, we don't believe in it at all -- Noam Chomsky
[ Home |
About NDACAN | Datasets |
User Support |
Contribute Data |
Summer Research Institute ]
[ CMRL List Serve | Bibliography
| Measures Index |
Useful Links | Search ]
Copyright © 1996-2012 National Data Archive on Child Abuse and Neglect