An excellent question. There's a link to an article on our webpage about the ineffectiveness of family preservation to prevent out of home placements. I hope somebody can come up with some reasons (besides grants and funding) that FP is still used. Sean Wolf Hill, MS LPCC Intersystem Coordinator http://www.co.greene.oh.us/fcf/fsp.htm Family Stability Program http://www.co.greene.oh.us/fcf/fcfd.htm Greene County Family and Children First Dept http://www.wright.edu/~shill/index.htm 937.562.5607p 937.562.5601f -----Original Message----- From: bill higgins [mailto:bill_higginsus@xxxxxxxxx] Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2001 11:23 AM To: Child Maltreatment Researchers Subject: family preservation We are reading about in-home services as part of our agency reading group. Can anyone answer why states still use family preservation programs when the research concludes that they don't prevent placement or child abuse? At least when compared with traditional programs. Bill __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Listen to your Yahoo! Mail messages from any phone. http://phone.yahoo.com
[ Home |
About NDACAN | Datasets |
User Support |
Contribute Data |
Summer Research Institute ]
[ CMRL List Serve | Bibliography
| Measures Index |
Useful Links | Search ]
Copyright © 1996-2012 National Data Archive on Child Abuse and Neglect