RE: Question about ethics issue in researching abuse

["Salahu-Din, Dr. Sakinah" <ssalahud@xxxxxxxx>]

I agree that participants should have access to the research. If they are
allowed to review the manuscript before it is finalized, and provide
comments, that is one way for the author to establish credibility of her
research, an important part of qualitative research.

Sakinah Salahu-Din, Ph.D., MSW
Associate Professor
Florida Gulf Coast University
College of Professional Studies
Division of Social Work
10501 FGCU Blvd. South
Ft Myers, FL 33965-3428
(941) 590-7867
ssalahud@fgcu.edu
 

-----Original Message-----
From: bill higgins [mailto:bill_higginsus@yahoo.com]
Sent: Monday, September 16, 2002 10:51 AM
To: Child Maltreatment Researchers
Subject: Re: Question about ethics issue in researching abuse


If participants wish to read the research (in this
case dissertation), I believe they have that right.  

I would focus the students attention on the study
design.  There seems to be major limitations
associated with identifying two victims who present
different symptoms.

Bill


--- Dan Taube <dtaube@alliant.edu> wrote:
> Dear List members,
>  
> I am an IRB chair, and have come up against an
> interesting question that I thought some of you
> might have had occasion to have previously
> addressed. We have a student interested in
> conducting qualitative research with two adults who
> were identified as being victims of Munchausens by
> Proxy.  Her research would involve using
> standardized psychological tests and interviews with
>  these adults--one of whom has apparently been
> significantly affected by his/her experience, and
> the other of whom has experienced less signifanct
> effects. One of the study's aims is to clarify which
> areas of functioning are most affected. Aside from
> the issue of the utility and design of this study,
> the committee members (as well as the student) are
> concerned about one risk in particular. That is,  is
> there a way to prevent family members (or the
> participants, for that matter) from obtaining the
> full published dissertation, with its description of
> the testing data and potential for misinterpretation
> or mi!
> suse? We've recommended that, at a minimum, at
> Certificate of Confidentiality be obtained by the
> student to protect the raw, identifiable data, and
> that she, of course disguise the participants as
> much as possible. And with our typical request that
> researchers offer a summary of results to
> participants upon the completion of the study, we
> believe it possible to provide results in a manner
> respectful of participants sensitivities. 
> Nonetheless, it would be relatively easy to identify
> the study and obtain a copy of the dissertation--as
> the student must inform participants about her
> status as a student at our school, and dissertations
> are available in our library (not to mention DAI). 
>  
> If you have any suggestions about how we might
> address this risk so the student could adequately
> protect these participants, it would be appreciated.
> 
>  
> Dan Taube
> AIU-California School of Professional Psychology
> 1005 Atlantic Ave.
> Alameda, CA 94501
> 510-523-2300 ext. 128
> dtaube@alliant.edu
>  
>  
>  
> 


__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! News - Today's headlines
http://news.yahoo.com