Granted, death is an infrequent outcome in abuse cases (thank heaven). However, the difference between aggravated assault and homicide is often a combination of luck (good or bad), and access to prompt medical care. Homicide is often studied because it is easy to count accurately, and because there is usually a lot of information available about these cases. Assault is much more frequent, harder to measure, and records are likely to be incomplete. Child homicide is literally the canary in the abuse coal mine. When less sensitive indicators are unavailable, death is a clear indicator of trouble. It seems to me that the point of the study is to confirm the suspicion that unrelated males in the household are a risk factor for child abuse. The problems measuring low base rates means that a relationship has to be very strong if we are going to pick it up as significant. The application of the information about risks associated with presence of unrelated males is just the same as the application of other risk factor information. It should support a closer look into family circumstances, and be added to other information on a case by case basis. Joan E. Crowley New Mexico State University Department of Criminal Justice MSC 3487 Box 30001 Las Cruces, NM 88003-8001 jcrowley@xxxxxxxx
[ Home |
About NDACAN | Datasets |
User Support |
Contribute Data |
Summer Research Institute ]
[ CMRL List Serve | Bibliography
| Measures Index |
Useful Links | Search ]
Copyright © 1996-2012 National Data Archive on Child Abuse and Neglect