|
We use teams to review cases for placement/therapy decisions with
Probationa and Mental Health, but even if teams of people doing family visits in
protective services DID work better, there is no money to fund this very
expensive way of operating in most U.S. jurisdictions. Few states put in
any more money for protective services investigations than is mandated by
minimum Federal matching requirements.
We are involved in the Annie E. Casey initiative entitled "Family to
Family" which includes "Team Decision Making" and developing group community
supports. You may wish to explore this at their web site. We are also
doing "Linkages", a Stuart Famly Foundation-funded intitiatvie in California
which involves bringing TANF staff into the protective services function to help
TANF families with referrals, but not full-blown "cases" before removal has to
be considered. This is another type of team. The initiative is
described at http://www.ccrwf.org.
Freya Schultz
Santa Barbara County
Freya Schultz
>From ???@??? Wed Oct 30 16:40:32 2002Staff Analyst Santa Barbara County Social Services 234 Camino del Remedio Santa Barbara, CA 93110 (805) 681-4626 <freya@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>> byrneml@xxxxxx 10/30/02 08:14AM >>> Colleagues, In concert with our State Department of Social Services we are looking for information specific to using a team (vs. one on one) approach in Family/Child Protective Work. Specifically, we are looking for feedback from demonstration projects, or models like this operating in public child welfare systems. We are looking for published as well as non-published contacts to gather data regarding the effectiveness of team work in child/family protective systems. That is, many states still >use a caseworker to case method: we are looking for data regarding the models >and effectiveness of a team model in this work. This straddles both research >as well as practice reporting: qualitative reports from programs now engaged >in this model are welcome as well. Much appreciated. Please CC John Vogel above in your response. Mary Byrne Mary Byrne byrneml@xxxxxx Boston College GSSW Status: U Return-Path: Received: from elist02.mail.cornell.edu (elist02.mail.cornell.edu [132.236.56.15]) by postoffice.mail.cornell.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA24261; Wed, 30 Oct 2002 14:12:47 -0500 (EST) Received: (from daemon@localhost) by elist02.mail.cornell.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) id OAA11666; Wed, 30 Oct 2002 14:12:43 -0500 (EST) Received: from elist02.mail.cornell.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by elist02.mail.cornell.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id OAA11506; Wed, 30 Oct 2002 14:12:05 -0500 (EST) Received: from mailhub2.mail.cornell.edu (mailhub2.mail.cornell.edu [132.236.56.26]) by elist02.mail.cornell.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id NAA01276 for Received: (from daemon@localhost) by mailhub2.mail.cornell.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) id NAA23704 for CHILD-MALTREATMENT-RESEARCH-L@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Wed, 30 Oct 2002 13:43:45 -0500 (EST) Received: from harumscarum.mr.itd.umich.edu (harumscarum.mr.itd.umich.edu [141.211.125.17]) by mailhub2.mail.cornell.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id NAA23685 for Received: from sw-9v37f11.ccs.itd.umich.edu (dhcp-17-49.ssw.umich.edu [141.211.17.49]) by harumscarum.mr.itd.umich.edu (8.9.3/3.3s) with ESMTP id NAA01865 for Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2002 13:43:43 -0500 X-PH: V4.1@mailhub2 X-PH: V4.1@elist02 (Cornell Modified) From: Kathleen Faller Sender: owner-CHILD-MALTREATMENT-RESEARCH-L@xxxxxxxxxxx To: Child Maltreatment Researchers Subject: Re: boot camps Message-ID: <16602203.1035985423@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> In-Reply-To: <20021029175601.74070.qmail@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> References: <20021029175601.74070.qmail@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> X-Mailer: Mulberry/2.2.1 (Win32) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Tag: 5445 Reply-To: CHILD-MALTREATMENT-RESEARCH-L@xxxxxxxxxxx X-Sender: kcfaller@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.2.09.cu.03/021023/11:56 -- ListProc(tm) by CREN I believe the findings are that it is not an effective intervention, but I don't have cites. --On Tuesday, October 29, 2002 9:56 AM -0800 bill higgins > Is there any evidence that juvenile boot camps are an > effective treatment approach? > > Bill > > __________________________________________________ > Do you Yahoo!? > HotJobs - Search new jobs daily now > http://hotjobs.yahoo.com/ Kathleen Coulborn Faller, Ph.D., A.C.S.W. Professor, School of Social Work Director, Family Assessment Clinic 1080 S. University Ave., 2704 Ann Arbor, MI. 48109-1106 Phone: 734-998-9702 Fax: 734-998-9710 email: kcfaller@xxxxxxxxx |
[ Home |
About NDACAN | Datasets |
User Support |
Contribute Data |
Summer Research Institute ]
[ CMRL List Serve | Bibliography
| Measures Index |
Useful Links | Search ]
Copyright © 1996-2012 National Data Archive on Child Abuse and Neglect