unsubstantiated cases of abuse

["sherioz" <sherioz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Title: Message

Thanks

-----Original Message-----
From: Walker, Candice (Research Asst.) [mailto:Candice_Walker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 4:06 PM
To: Child Maltreatment Researchers
Subject: RE: Effects of recreation programs

Christine, while this information is not completely empirical, it was helpful in fund raising and may be what you are looking for.

 

        American Camping Association--http://www.acacamps.org/research/grant.htm

-----Original Message-----
From: Walsh, Christine [mailto:walshc@xxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 12:43 PM
To: Child Maltreatment Researchers
Subject: Effects of recreation programs

Is anyone aware of research that shows the effect of recreational programs on child outcomes for children in the child welfare system (not necessarily in foster care)?

Christine Walsh
Research Associate
Canadian Centre for the Studies of Children at Risk
McMaster University, HHSC
Chedoke Division
Patterson Building, Room 420
Hamilton ON L8N 3Z5

Phone: (905) 521-2100 x74357
Fax: (905) 383-8068
Email: walshc@xxxxxxxxxxx

"This message is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed, and may contain information that is privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or is the employee or agent responsible for delivery of the message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication of this information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by telephone.

If there is an error in communication, please call the sender at (713) 986-3300. Thank you"

>From ???@??? Tue Feb 04 09:16:08 2003
Status: U
Return-Path:

Received: from elist02.mail.cornell.edu (elist02.mail.cornell.edu [132.236.56.15])
by postoffice.mail.cornell.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA03341;
Mon, 3 Feb 2003 17:32:57 -0500 (EST)
Received: (from daemon@localhost)
by elist02.mail.cornell.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) id RAA10412;
Mon, 3 Feb 2003 17:32:50 -0500 (EST)
Received: from elist02.mail.cornell.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by elist02.mail.cornell.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id RAA10322;
Mon, 3 Feb 2003 17:32:26 -0500 (EST)
Received: from mailhub2.mail.cornell.edu (mailhub2.mail.cornell.edu [132.236.56.26])
by elist02.mail.cornell.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id JAA02797
for ; Mon, 3 Feb 2003 09:31:33 -0500 (EST)
Received: from mailhub2.mail.cornell.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by mailhub2.mail.cornell.edu (8.12.6/8.12.6) with ESMTP id h13EVYbA013433
for ; Mon, 3 Feb 2003 09:31:34 -0500 (EST)
Received: (from daemon@localhost)
by mailhub2.mail.cornell.edu (8.12.6/8.12.6/Submit) id h13EVYNj013421
for CHILD-MALTREATMENT-RESEARCH-L@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Mon, 3 Feb 2003 09:31:34 -0500 (EST)
Received: from smtp3.wiscmail.wisc.edu (blitzen.doit.wisc.edu [144.92.197.183])
by mailhub2.mail.cornell.edu (8.12.6/8.12.6) with ESMTP id h13EVXbA013383
for ; Mon, 3 Feb 2003 09:31:33 -0500 (EST)
Received: from conversion-daemon.smtp3.doit.wisc.edu by smtp3.doit.wisc.edu
(iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 1.05 (built Nov 6 2002))
id <0H9Q00L01LOHJP@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> for
CHILD-MALTREATMENT-RESEARCH-L@xxxxxxxxxxx; Mon,
03 Feb 2003 08:31:33 -0600 (CST)
Received: from default (ras-c5800-2-53-96.dialup.wisc.edu [128.104.53.96])
by smtp3.doit.wisc.edu
(iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 1.05 (built Nov 6 2002))
with SMTP id <0H9Q00F86LO7J3@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Mon,
03 Feb 2003 08:31:32 -0600 (CST)
Date: Mon, 03 Feb 2003 08:27:01 -0600
X-PH: V4.1@mailhub2
X-PH: V4.1@elist02 (Cornell Modified)
From: Vincent Fish
Subject: Re: differential treatment programs for adolescent male versus
femalechild sexual abuse offenders
In-reply-to: <006301c2c9c5$388cff60$1061003e@m7p7x4>
X-Sender: vfish@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To: Child Maltreatment Researchers
Cc: CHILD-MALTREATMENT-RESEARCH-L@xxxxxxxxxxx (Child-Maltreatment-Research-L)
Message-id: <4.1.20030203081306.025d92a0@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
MIME-version: 1.0
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.1
Content-type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="Boundary_(ID_g0daY5wp1RaCxEKG0rY0og)"
References: <41B078252F4FD31180A3009027937DC102EC74FD@CORPEXCHANGE1>
<4.1.20030130083152.02795790@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Message-Tag: 5811
Reply-To: CHILD-MALTREATMENT-RESEARCH-L@xxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-CHILD-MALTREATMENT-RESEARCH-L@xxxxxxxxxxx
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.2.09.cu.03/021023/11:56 -- ListProc(tm) by CREN

Hi, Sheri--

Here is a somewhat idealistic definition from Wraparound Niagara <http://www.ncyc.com/Wrap/wngloss.html>:

"Wraparound is not a program or a type of service. It is a community process. The Process is a way to improve the lives of children and families who
have complex needs. It is used to assist children and families and communities in developing individualized plans of care to assist and support
children/families in their community. Planning, services and supports, cuts across traditional agency boundaries by multi-agency involvement, funding
and informal resources."

As you see, in its essence, it's an important but not a particularly new idea and I think its successful execution depends, as usual, on the ability of the various staff involved in a specific case to truly collaborate on a fairly sophisticated level. And, as always, in a given community, such a program (or "process") may come with various idealogical trappings and institutional/economic agendas that are not necessarily compatible with its stated mission.

Best wishes,
Vince



At 08:55 AM 2/1/03 +0200, you wrote:

Vincent:
 
What is a wraparound process?  Just briefly so I get an idea.
 
Thanks,
Sheri Oz

Vincent Fish, PhD, MSSW

700 Rayovac Drive, Suite 220

Madison, WI  53711

USA

608-276-9191

vfish@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

>From ???@??? Tue Feb 04 09:16:08 2003
Status: U
Return-Path:
Received: from elist02.mail.cornell.edu (elist02.mail.cornell.edu [132.236.56.15])
by postoffice.mail.cornell.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA14804;
Mon, 3 Feb 2003 17:37:20 -0500 (EST)
Received: (from daemon@localhost)
by elist02.mail.cornell.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) id RAA11519;
Mon, 3 Feb 2003 17:37:14 -0500 (EST)
Received: from elist02.mail.cornell.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by elist02.mail.cornell.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id RAA10562;
Mon, 3 Feb 2003 17:33:11 -0500 (EST)
Received: from mailhub3.mail.cornell.edu (mailhub3.mail.cornell.edu [132.236.56.24])
by elist02.mail.cornell.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA18048
for ; Mon, 3 Feb 2003 11:22:55 -0500 (EST)
Received: from mailhub3.mail.cornell.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by mailhub3.mail.cornell.edu (8.12.6/8.12.6) with ESMTP id h13GMufa007079
for ; Mon, 3 Feb 2003 11:22:56 -0500 (EST)
Received: (from daemon@localhost)
by mailhub3.mail.cornell.edu (8.12.6/8.12.6/Submit) id h13GMudH007071
for CHILD-MALTREATMENT-RESEARCH-L@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Mon, 3 Feb 2003 11:22:56 -0500 (EST)
Received: from mx.usuhs.mil (mx.usuhs.mil [131.158.7.228])
by mailhub3.mail.cornell.edu (8.12.6/8.12.6) with ESMTP id h13GMtfa007020
for ; Mon, 3 Feb 2003 11:22:55 -0500 (EST)
Received: from mxb.usuhs.mil (mxb.usuhs.mil [131.158.7.192])
by mx.usuhs.mil (8.11.2/8.11.6) with SMTP id h13GVrA01662
for ; Mon, 3 Feb 2003 11:31:53 -0500
Received: from dombldgb-Message_Server by mxb.usuhs.mil
with Novell_GroupWise; Mon, 03 Feb 2003 11:18:17 -0500
Message-Id:
X-Mailer: Novell GroupWise 5.5.5
Date: Mon, 03 Feb 2003 11:18:01 -0500
X-PH: V4.1@mailhub3
X-PH: V4.1@elist02 (Cornell Modified)
From: "James McCarroll"
To: Child Maltreatment Researchers
Subject: Evaluations of advocacy
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by elist02.mail.cornell.edu id LAA18049
Message-Tag: 5812
Reply-To: CHILD-MALTREATMENT-RESEARCH-L@xxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-CHILD-MALTREATMENT-RESEARCH-L@xxxxxxxxxxx
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.2.09.cu.03/021023/11:56 -- ListProc(tm) by CREN

Does anyone know of research or other scholarly efforts (such as a literature review) to evaluate the effectiveness of advocacy in domestic violence or child abuse? Thank you.