[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Mandated services for substantiated cases
<x-html><HTML>
<HEAD>
<TITLE>Re: Mandated services for substantiated cases</TITLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY>
<FONT FACE="Verdana">On 5/30/01 2:24 PM, "Christina Risley-Curtiss" <risley.curtiss@asu.edu> wrote:<BR>
<BR>
</FONT><BLOCKQUOTE><FONT SIZE="2"><FONT FACE="Arial">I stand corrected. According to a staff person at the NY State Office of Children and Families they can order services as a result of a substantiated abuse and neglect report even if the child is not placed in foster care. So the tally so far is ---everyone I have heard from (add Vermont )but AZ can order services--including 2 provinces in Canada. Thanks for the help. Please keep the information coming. It will be very helpful.<BR>
</FONT></FONT><FONT FACE="Verdana"><BR>
</FONT><FONT SIZE="2"><FONT FACE="Arial">Christina Risley-Curtiss, MSSW, PhD</FONT></FONT><FONT FACE="Verdana"> <BR>
</FONT><FONT SIZE="2"><FONT FACE="Arial">Associate Professor & Co-Director of the Child Welfare Project</FONT></FONT><FONT FACE="Verdana"> <BR>
</FONT><FONT SIZE="2"><FONT FACE="Arial">Arizona State University</FONT></FONT><FONT FACE="Verdana"> <BR>
</FONT><FONT SIZE="2"><FONT FACE="Arial">School of Social Work</FONT></FONT><FONT FACE="Verdana"> <BR>
</FONT><FONT SIZE="2"><FONT FACE="Arial">Tempe, AZ 85287-1802</FONT></FONT><FONT FACE="Verdana"> <BR>
</FONT><FONT SIZE="2"><FONT FACE="Arial">Phone: 480-965-6076</FONT></FONT><FONT FACE="Verdana"> <BR>
</FONT><FONT SIZE="2"><FONT FACE="Arial">Fax: 480-065-5986</FONT></FONT><FONT FACE="Verdana"> <BR>
<BR>
</FONT></BLOCKQUOTE><FONT FACE="Verdana"><BR>
They can order services, but does the client have to accept them without a court-order? Murray Levine</FONT>
</BODY>
</HTML>
</x-html>From ???@??? Mon Sep 10 16:32:08 2001
Status: U
Return-Path: <owner-CHILD-MALTREATMENT-RESEARCH-L@cornell.edu>
Received: from elist01.mail.cornell.edu (elist01.mail.cornell.edu [132.236.56.28])
by postoffice.mail.cornell.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA06396;
Mon, 10 Sep 2001 16:18:21 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from daemon@localhost)
by elist01.mail.cornell.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) id QAA24771;
Mon, 10 Sep 2001 16:18:14 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from elist01.mail.cornell.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by elist01.mail.cornell.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id QAA22549;
Mon, 10 Sep 2001 16:09:01 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from cornell.edu (cornell.edu [132.236.56.6])
by elist01.mail.cornell.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id NAA25361
for <CHILD-MALTREATMENT-RESEARCH-L@elist01.mail.cornell.edu>; Mon, 10 Sep 2001 13:32:11 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from daemon@localhost)
by cornell.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) id NAA14435
for CHILD-MALTREATMENT-RESEARCH-L@elist01.mail.cornell.edu; Mon, 10 Sep 2001 13:32:11 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from smtp3.acsu.buffalo.edu (smtp3.acsu.buffalo.edu [128.205.6.86])
by cornell.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id NAA14405
for <CHILD-MALTREATMENT-RESEARCH-L@cornell.edu>; Mon, 10 Sep 2001 13:32:10 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (qmail 22480 invoked from network); 10 Sep 2001 17:32:09 -0000
Received: from ubppp248-187.dialin.buffalo.edu (HELO ?128.205.248.187?) (128.205.248.187)
by smtp3 with SMTP; 10 Sep 2001 17:32:09 -0000
User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/9.0.2509
Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2001 13:35:43 -0400
Subject: Re: Standards for indicating abuse or neglect
X-PH: V4.1@cornell.edu (Cornell Modified)
X-PH: V4.1@elist01.mail.cornell.edu (Cornell Modified)
From: adeline/murray levine <psylevin@acsu.buffalo.edu>
To: Child Maltreatment Researchers <CHILD-MALTREATMENT-RESEARCH-L@cornell.edu>
Message-ID: <B7C2722F.1706%psylevin@acsu.buffalo.edu>
In-Reply-To: <5F1150B56E8DD311BF990008C7917EE003582A16@CTDCFCNTRL08>
Mime-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
Message-Tag: 3076
Reply-To: CHILD-MALTREATMENT-RESEARCH-L@cornell.edu
Sender: owner-CHILD-MALTREATMENT-RESEARCH-L@cornell.edu
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.2.09.cu01/000107/15:22 -- ListProc(tm) by CREN
On 9/7/01 3:44 PM, "NORTH, FRED" <FRED.NORTH@po.state.ct.us> wrote:
> The National Clearinghouse on Child Abuse and Neglect has a good set of
> reference material that provides all the definitions, not sure about
> articles discussing the differences though. Hope this helps!
>
> http://www.calib.com/nccanch/statutes/index.cfm#About
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: John Poertner [mailto:jpoertne@uiuc.edu]
> Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 3:43 PM
> To: Child Maltreatment Researchers
> Subject: Standards for indicating abuse or neglect
>
>
> Does anyone know of a an article or report that discusses the standards that
> different states use to substantiate or indicate a report of abuse or
> neglect?
>
> Thanks
>
> John Poertner
> Children and Family Research Center
>
>
>
Levine, M. (1998). Do standards of proof affect decision making in child
protection investigations? Law and Human Behavior, 22(3),341-347.