[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Mandated Services for substantiated CPS cases
<x-html><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD><TITLE>Mandated Services for substantiated CPS cases</TITLE>
<META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<META content="MSHTML 5.50.4522.1800" name=GENERATOR></HEAD>
<BODY>
<DIV><SPAN class=270124516-30052001><FONT color=#0000ff>Let me disagree on what
you learned about New York. In New York State court ordered services can
be ordered without placement. Orders of supervision, including specific
services and orders of protections can be ordered at the dispositional hearing
of a neglect or abuse proceeding. Dispositional orders in New York are for
a maximum initial period of twelve months and can be extended for cause in
one year intervals. The orders of supervision are commonly used following
a period of placement as a modification of an earlier placement
order. Orders of protection can preclude any specific behavior; no
corporal punishment, no drug use, no drug use in the presence of children, stay
away orders for an individual, whatever the behavior the court objects to in the
individual family's situation. The orders of supervision can be very
specific or general depending on the family's need and the willingness of the
court process to be clear or leave room for interpretation. Very specific
orders can be problematic in more frequent need to modify orders as
family situations change. General orders can be problematic in
forcing compliance or success in services where resistance occurs. The
legal art is in choosing an order that best assists a family towards
successful completion of services or violation as
appropriate.</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DL>
<DIV align=center>
<CENTER>
<DL>
<DIV align=center>
<CENTER>
<DT style="mso-layout-grid-align: none"><SPAN
style="FONT-SIZE: 11pt; COLOR: blue; mso-bidi-font-size: 10.0pt">
<DIV align=center><SPAN class=660273115-08022001></SPAN><SPAN
style="FONT-SIZE: 11pt; COLOR: blue; mso-bidi-font-size: 10.0pt"><FONT
size=2>
<DIV class=MsoNormal
style="TEXT-ALIGN: center; mso-layout-grid-align: none"><SPAN
style="FONT-SIZE: 11pt; COLOR: blue; mso-bidi-font-size: 10.0pt"><FONT
size=3>Larry Earl Wraight, Ex. Dir.<?xml:namespace prefix = u1
/><u1:p> </u1:p><?xml:namespace prefix = o ns =
"urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" /><o:p></o:p></FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV class=MsoNormal style="TEXT-ALIGN: center; mso-layout-grid-align: none"
align=center><U><SPAN style="COLOR: red"><u1:p></u1:p><FONT size=3><SPAN
style="COLOR: red"><u1:p></u1:p><FONT size=3><A
href="http://www.childprotective.org/page2.html";><FONT
color=#ff0000><STRONG>Fighting on the FrontLine for
CHILDREN</STRONG></FONT><u1:p></SPAN><SPAN
style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; COLOR: blue">
</u1:p></A></FONT></SPAN></SPAN></U></FONT></DIV>
<DIV class=MsoNormal style="TEXT-ALIGN: center; mso-layout-grid-align: none"
align=center><SPAN
style="FONT-SIZE: 11pt; COLOR: blue; mso-bidi-font-size: 10.0pt"><u1:p></u1:p><FONT
size=3>National Child Protective Workers Association,
Inc.<o:p></o:p></FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV class=MsoNormal style="TEXT-ALIGN: center; mso-layout-grid-align: none"
align=center><SPAN
style="FONT-SIZE: 11pt; COLOR: blue; mso-bidi-font-size: 10.0pt"><FONT
size=3>27 Ford St. Baldwinsville, NY
13027-2328<u1:p> </u1:p><o:p></o:p></FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV class=MsoNormal style="TEXT-ALIGN: center; mso-layout-grid-align: none"
align=center><SPAN
style="FONT-SIZE: 11pt; COLOR: blue; mso-bidi-font-size: 10.0pt"><u1:p><FONT
size=3>Web page: </FONT></u1:p><A
href="http://www.childprotective.org/";><u1:p><FONT color=#ff0000
size=3>www.childprotective.org</FONT></A></u1:p><o:p></o:p></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV class=MsoNormal style="TEXT-ALIGN: center; mso-layout-grid-align: none"
align=center><SPAN
style="FONT-SIZE: 11pt; COLOR: blue; mso-bidi-font-size: 10.0pt"><u1:p><FONT
size=3>e-mail: </FONT><A href="mailto:larry@childprotective.org";><FONT
size=3>larry@childprotective.org</FONT></A><FONT size=3> - Phone
315-635-4791</FONT></u1:p><o:p></o:p></SPAN></DIV></FONT></SPAN></DIV></SPAN></CENTER></DT></DIV></DL></DIV></DL></CENTER>
<BLOCKQUOTE>
<DIV class=OutlookMessageHeader dir=ltr align=left><FONT face=Tahoma
size=2>-----Original Message-----<BR><B>From:</B>
owner-CHILD-MALTREATMENT-RESEARCH-L@cornell.edu
[mailto:owner-CHILD-MALTREATMENT-RESEARCH-L@cornell.edu]<B>On Behalf Of
</B>Christina Risley-Curtiss<BR><B>Sent:</B> Tuesday, May 29, 2001 2:51
PM<BR><B>To:</B> Child Maltreatment Researchers<BR><B>Subject:</B> Mandated
Services for substantiated CPS cases<BR><BR></FONT></DIV>
<P><FONT face=Arial size=2>Thank to all of you who replied to my recent
inquiry about which states can court order services to CPS families in cases
of substantiated reports of abuse or negect but where the children are not
removed. So far this is what i have:</FONT></P>
<P><FONT face=Arial size=2>7 + one in Canada can do so (CA, Conn, Ohio, VA,
Wisconsin, NH, Minnesota and New Brunswick, CA) and 2 who cannot --NY and of
course my state, AZ. I still need to hear about the other 41 states and DC!!!!
Please help me. This information is important to our developing a plan of
action here. Thanks. </FONT></P>
<P><FONT face=Arial size=2>Christina Risley-Curtiss, MSSW, PhD</FONT>
<BR><FONT face=Arial size=2>Associate Professor & Co-Director, Child
Welfare Training Project</FONT> <BR><FONT face=Arial size=2>Arizona State
University</FONT> <BR><FONT face=Arial size=2>School of Social Work</FONT>
<BR><FONT face=Arial size=2>Tempe, AZ 85287-1802</FONT> <BR><FONT face=Arial
size=2>480-965-6076</FONT> <BR><FONT face=Arial size=2>Fax:
480-965-5986</FONT> </P><BR></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>
</x-html>From ???@??? Tue Feb 22 09:13:46 2000
Status: U
Return-Path: <owner-CHILD-MALTREATMENT-RESEARCH-L@cornell.edu>
Received: from elist01.mail.cornell.edu (ELIST01.MAIL.CORNELL.EDU [132.236.56.28])
by postoffice.mail.cornell.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id IAA23360;
Tue, 22 Feb 2000 08:53:06 -0500 (EST)
Received: (from daemon@localhost)
by elist01.mail.cornell.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) id IAA04051;
Tue, 22 Feb 2000 08:53:04 -0500 (EST)
Received: from elist01.mail.cornell.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by elist01.mail.cornell.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id IAA03845;
Tue, 22 Feb 2000 08:46:17 -0500 (EST)
Received: from router2.mail.cornell.edu (ROUTER2.MAIL.CORNELL.EDU [132.236.56.16])
by elist01.mail.cornell.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id GAA29823
for <CHILD-MALTREATMENT-RESEARCH-L@elist01.mail.cornell.edu>; Tue, 22 Feb 2000 06:21:07 -0500 (EST)
Received: (from daemon@localhost)
by router2.mail.cornell.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) id GAA11514
for CHILD-MALTREATMENT-RESEARCH-L@elist01.mail.cornell.edu; Tue, 22 Feb 2000 06:21:07 -0500 (EST)
Received: from mail.datasync.com (mail.datasync.com [205.216.82.4])
by router2.mail.cornell.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id GAA11508
for <CHILD-MALTREATMENT-RESEARCH-L@cornell.edu>; Tue, 22 Feb 2000 06:21:06 -0500 (EST)
Received: from default.datasync.com (pic2-40.datasync.com [209.102.169.168]) by mail.datasync.com (8.8.8/Datasync) with ESMTP id FAA30691 for <CHILD-MALTREATMENT-RESEARCH-L@cornell.edu>; Tue, 22 Feb 2000 05:21:04 -0600
Message-Id: <4.3.0.20000222051841.00a91970@pop.datasync.com>
X-Sender: wagonerl@pop.datasync.com
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 4.3
Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2000 05:22:42 -0600
X-PH: V4.1@router2.mail.cornell.edu (Cornell Modified)
X-PH: V4.1@elist01.mail.cornell.edu (Cornell Modified)
To: Child Maltreatment Researchers <CHILD-MALTREATMENT-RESEARCH-L@cornell.edu>
From: Larry Wagoner <wagonerl@datasync.com>
Subject: RE: CPS referrals re:sexual abuse registries
In-Reply-To: <DDA768B49328D31189510008C79F2A98DF8481@DCC-NT2>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
Message-Tag: 104
Reply-To: CHILD-MALTREATMENT-RESEARCH-L@cornell.edu
Sender: owner-CHILD-MALTREATMENT-RESEARCH-L@cornell.edu
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.2.09.cu01/000107/15:22 -- ListProc(tm) by CREN
At about 04:19 PM 2/21/00 -0600, Lundgren, Susi said, and I answered:
>In some preliminary research I conducted on the recidivism of sex offenders
>who have been through treatment, successful completion of sex offender
>treatment was most often defined by therapists as "Successful completion of
>all assignments." The cite is:
It is an unusual notion, however, since all experts agree that there is no
"cure" for a sex offender. Under those circumstances, it is fairly clear
that there is *no* "successful completion" of treatment - but rather only
successful participation in treatment to this point.
See Hanson and Bussier, 1996, 1998.
>I think a major issue here is what constitutes "successful" completion of
>treatment. In the area of domestic violence and batterer programs,
>attendance at program sessions is the lowest level of evaluation. More
>important is a change in attitude and (my opinion) admission of
>responsibility for battering, honest remorse, and declaration of how things
>will change. Perhaps some of this is applicable to perpetrators of child
>molestation.
It is also notable that risk factors such as denial, victim empathy and
remorse do not clearly correlate with re-offending. The program that I work
with does not emphasize these things, but rather focuses on the risk
factors that do correlate with re-offending.
Larry Wagoner, MSW, CCSW II