[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Early recognition of seriousness

To: Child Maltreatment Researchers <CHILD-MALTREATMENT-RESEARCH-L@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Early recognition of seriousness
From: DSWLFSU@xxxxxxx
Date: Fri, 11 May 2001 07:57:07 EDT
Message-Tag: 2543
Reply-To: CHILD-MALTREATMENT-RESEARCH-L@xxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-CHILD-MALTREATMENT-RESEARCH-L@xxxxxxxxxxx

<x-html><HTML><FONT FACE=arial,helvetica><FONT  SIZE=2>Two thoughts occur to me about this:
<BR>1) I think there is a great need to build into assessments and subsequent 
<BR>family work the Prochaska/diClemente model of change which i think isn't as 
<BR>central to practice as it should be. There's a summary of this work in the 
<BR>Reader accompanying the new Framework
<BR>2) I believe that all case files should have a Critical Incident File at the 
<BR>front of the file so that all incidents of note can be put down and this, 
<BR>freed from all the vast accumulation of detail that files inevitably gather, 
<BR>can give a readily available overview of the <U>pattern</U> of events. A particular 
<BR>inquiry into a child death in Sheffield a few years ago argued this point 
<BR>very persuasively.
<BR>
<BR>David Saltiel
<BR>Service Manager
<BR>West Leeds Family Service Units
<BR>Tel: 0113-275-7600
<BR>email: dswlfsu@aol.com</FONT></HTML>
</x-html>From ???@??? Tue Aug 21 10:53:10 2001
Status: U
Return-Path: <owner-CHILD-MALTREATMENT-RESEARCH-L@cornell.edu>
Received: from elist01.mail.cornell.edu (elist01.mail.cornell.edu [132.236.56.28])
	by postoffice.mail.cornell.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA14957;
	Tue, 21 Aug 2001 10:48:44 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from daemon@localhost)
	by elist01.mail.cornell.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) id KAA10220;
	Tue, 21 Aug 2001 10:48:38 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from elist01.mail.cornell.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by elist01.mail.cornell.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id KAA08480;
	Tue, 21 Aug 2001 10:30:43 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from router2.mail.cornell.edu (router2.mail.cornell.edu [132.236.56.16])
	by elist01.mail.cornell.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id FAA13099
	for <CHILD-MALTREATMENT-RESEARCH-L@elist01.mail.cornell.edu>; Tue, 21 Aug 2001 05:08:52 -0400 (EDT)
X-PH: V4.1@elist01.mail.cornell.edu (Cornell Modified) 
From: DSWLFSU@aol.com
Received: (from daemon@localhost)
	by router2.mail.cornell.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) id FAA28872
	for CHILD-MALTREATMENT-RESEARCH-L@elist01.mail.cornell.edu; Tue, 21 Aug 2001 05:08:50 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from imo-m06.mx.aol.com (imo-m06.mx.aol.com [64.12.136.161])
	by router2.mail.cornell.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id FAA28866
	for <CHILD-MALTREATMENT-RESEARCH-L@cornell.edu>; Tue, 21 Aug 2001 05:08:49 -0400 (EDT)
X-PH: V4.1@router2.mail.cornell.edu (Cornell Modified) 
Received: from DSWLFSU@aol.com
	by imo-m06.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v31_r1.4.) id q.6f.19763822 (17236)
	 for <CHILD-MALTREATMENT-RESEARCH-L@cornell.edu>; Tue, 21 Aug 2001 05:08:48 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <6f.19763822.28b37f1f@aol.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2001 05:08:47 EDT
Subject: Re: PRETEXT conversations as an investigative tool
To: Child Maltreatment Researchers <CHILD-MALTREATMENT-RESEARCH-L@cornell.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="part1_6f.19763822.28b37f1f_boundary"
X-Mailer: AOL 6.0 for Windows UK sub 10503
Message-Tag: 2954
Reply-To: CHILD-MALTREATMENT-RESEARCH-L@cornell.edu
Sender: owner-CHILD-MALTREATMENT-RESEARCH-L@cornell.edu
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.2.09.cu01/000107/15:22 -- ListProc(tm) by CREN

<x-html><HTML><FONT FACE=arial,helvetica><FONT  SIZE=2>Reading the extensive e-correspondence on this issue I must say I am really 
<BR>shocked that no-one has questioned the ethics of getting the victim, albeit 
<BR>with support, to confront the alleged perpetrator. I find it really hard to 
<BR>justify putting an abused child through what would very likely be another 
<BR>deeply disturbing and abusive experience, done to obtain evidence for a court 
<BR>case. The whole thing sounds fraught with ethical and moral objections. Maybe 
<BR>I'm just old fashioned her but I've always thought that it's treatment and 
<BR>help for the abused child that should be our first concern
<BR>
<BR>David Saltiel
<BR>Service Manager
<BR>West Leeds Family Service Units
<BR>Tel: 0113-275-7600
<BR>email: dswlfsu@aol.com</FONT></HTML>
</x-html>From ???@??? Tue Oct 09 10:44:39 2001
Status: U
Return-Path: <owner-CHILD-MALTREATMENT-RESEARCH-L@cornell.edu>
Received: from elist01.mail.cornell.edu (elist01.mail.cornell.edu [132.236.56.28])
	by postoffice.mail.cornell.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA03799;
	Tue, 9 Oct 2001 10:39:58 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from daemon@localhost)
	by elist01.mail.cornell.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) id KAA27439;
	Tue, 9 Oct 2001 10:39:56 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from elist01.mail.cornell.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by elist01.mail.cornell.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id KAA27360;
	Tue, 9 Oct 2001 10:39:21 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mailhub2.mail.cornell.edu (mailhub2.mail.cornell.edu [132.236.56.26])
	by elist01.mail.cornell.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id GAA27934
	for <CHILD-MALTREATMENT-RESEARCH-L@elist01.mail.cornell.edu>; Tue, 9 Oct 2001 06:38:38 -0400 (EDT)
X-PH: V4.1@elist01.mail.cornell.edu (Cornell Modified) 
From: DSWLFSU@aol.com
Received: (from daemon@localhost)
	by mailhub2.mail.cornell.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) id GAA23299
	for CHILD-MALTREATMENT-RESEARCH-L@elist01.mail.cornell.edu; Tue, 9 Oct 2001 06:38:38 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from imo-d09.mx.aol.com (imo-d09.mx.aol.com [205.188.157.41])
	by mailhub2.mail.cornell.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id GAA23280
	for <CHILD-MALTREATMENT-RESEARCH-L@cornell.edu>; Tue, 9 Oct 2001 06:38:37 -0400 (EDT)
X-PH: V4.1@mailhub2 (Cornell Modified) 
Received: from DSWLFSU@aol.com
	by imo-d09.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v31_r1.7.) id q.39.1bc988c1 (25715)
	 for <CHILD-MALTREATMENT-RESEARCH-L@cornell.edu>; Tue, 9 Oct 2001 06:38:35 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <39.1bc988c1.28f42daa@aol.com>
Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2001 06:38:34 EDT
Subject: Re: Abuse/neglect and cognitive deficits
To: Child Maltreatment Researchers <CHILD-MALTREATMENT-RESEARCH-L@cornell.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: AOL 5.0 for Windows sub 107
Message-Tag: 3319
Reply-To: CHILD-MALTREATMENT-RESEARCH-L@cornell.edu
Sender: owner-CHILD-MALTREATMENT-RESEARCH-L@cornell.edu
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.2.09.cu01/000107/15:22 -- ListProc(tm) by CREN

This needs some careful thinking about: child abuse and neglect is a pretty 
wide area and different forms of maltreatment will have different effects on 
cognition. UK research strongly suggests that long term emotional abuse and 
neglect has the most serious effects. It is the effect of maltreatment on 
attachments that seems to me to be most important. The best authority I know 
of on the relationship between attachment disorders and cognition is Patricia 
Crittenden who has written very widely.

David Saltiel 
Service Manager
West Leeds FSU
3 Chiswick St
Leeds LS6 1QE
0113 - 275 - 7600
dswlfsu@aol.com

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Early recognition of seriousness
  - From: bill higgins

Prev by Date: Hiv Aids and Hep A B & C
Next by Date: RE: Early recognition of seriousness
Prev by thread: Early recognition of seriousness
Next by thread: Re: Early recognition of seriousness
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread