On Wed, 27 Jul 2005, Brian Morgan wrote: [snip] > Some have already argued that when an eminent expert slips in one > respect then maybe > other parts of his work should also be examined. He did after all shred > (or had shredded) all his paperwork > and data from his research and case studies so they could not be > independently reviewed > to validate the opinions expressed in court. This is wrong. This is wrong everywhere that I know of, even if it is simply a research paper being published, let alone evidentiary material where life and liberty are at stake. You cannot punish a researcher enough for this kind of fraud. (Sure, maybe the destroyed data DID support his conclusions. Just where is the evidence for that, now?) -- John M. Price, PhD jmprice@xxxxxxxxxx Life: Chemistry, but with feeling! | PGP Key on request or FTP! Comoderator: sci.psychology.psychotherapy.moderated Atheist# DCLXXXIII
[ Home |
About NDACAN | Datasets |
User Support |
Contribute Data |
Summer Research Institute ]
[ CMRL List Serve | Bibliography
| Measures Index |
Useful Links | Search ]
Copyright © 1996-2012 National Data Archive on Child Abuse and Neglect