Why not "DAD GIRLFRIEND" too? If I may dare to try a joke, I would say that avoiding to mention her is a proof of anti-masculine bias (please: it is a joke, attempted by an old italian physician, whose english is failing). On a more serious plane, in my past experience all erotic "friends" (of both genders) of any of the biological parents may turn out to be both initiators and perpetrators of any form of abuse on their "friend" offspring. As for lumping together some of your categories, you might refer to the family circles: but this might be a typically "legal italian" usage. Here in Italy, we speak of "nuclear family" (parents/adult caregivers-children) and "extended family" which comprises relatives up to the 4th degree (i.e. grand parents, aunts/uncles and so-called "first cousins" i.e. the children of aunts/uncles, and in-laws). Around them, there are the "caregiving" figures and groups (teachers, nurses, doctors, or - in the case of already critical families - the support networks). In this way you would emphasize not the formal status of the person (her/his being an uncle, a close relative etc.), but her/his closeness to the victim, its daily life and the perpetrator's involvement in rearing the victim. Unfortunately, in all these family matters there isn't "the one best way", because Homo Sapiens Sapiens has a tendency to organize and reorganize its family life in the most astonishing ways, so that whatever your choice you will loose something of it. Best wishes, Dr. Virginio ODDONE, M.D. V. Avogadro 6 10121 - Torino (Italy) e-mail: oddovir@xxxxxxxxx medico.legale@xxxxxxxxx ****************** J'ai enfin le droit de saluer des êtres que je ne connais pas Ils passent devant moi et s'accumulent au loin Tandis que tout ce que j'en vois m'est inconnu Et leur espoir n'est pas moins fort que le mien. (Apollinaire, Le musicien de Saint-Merry.) Per loro natura tutti gli uomini desiderano di sapere. All men by nature desire to know Tous les hommes désirent naturellement de savoir. (Aristotele, Metafisica, Libro I, I, 1). ----- Original Message ----- From: "Deborah Stone" <DSTONE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> To: "Child Maltreatment Researchers" <CHILD-MALTREATMENT-RESEARCH-L@xxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Tuesday, July 01, 2008 5:22 PM Subject: perpetrators > I'm trying to figure out how to categorize perpetrators of physical and > sexual abuse (see list below) in an analysis and was wondering if anyone > has any advice how to do this. It seems one way is just to look at > parental figures/caregivers versus other but what about mother's boyfriend > or grandparent, foster parent, etc..? Should I lump these all together or > is it best to keep them > in their own categories? I'll check the literature as well. Thanks. > > The list of potential perpetrators and possible categories includes: > Parent figure/caregiver: > MOTHER > FATHER > STEP-MOTHER > STEP-FATHER > MOM'S BOYFRIEND > OUT-OF-HOME CAREGIVER (E.G., FOSTER PARENT) OR GROUP CARE PROVIDER > CHILD CARE PROVIDER > > Other relatives: > GRANDMOTHER > GRANDFATHER > AUNT > UNCLE > OTHER RELATIVE > > Other adults: > FRIEND > STRANGER > NEIGHBOR > > Siblings/Peers: > BROTHER > SISTER > OTHER CHILD IN OUT-OF-HOME CARE > BIOLOGICAL CHILD OF FOSTER PARENTS > OTHER FOSTER CHILD > > > Deb Stone, MPH, MSW > Suicide Prevention Training Consultant > MA Department of Public Health > Suicide Prevention Program > > Doctoral Candidate > Harvard School of Public Health > 617.432.5683 > Fax 617.432.3699 > dstone@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > >
[ Home |
About NDACAN | Datasets |
User Support |
Contribute Data |
Summer Research Institute ]
[ CMRL List Serve | Bibliography
| Measures Index |
Useful Links | Search ]
Copyright © 1996-2012 National Data Archive on Child Abuse and Neglect