[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Error Condition Re: LOCAL delivery error
Rejected message: sent to CHILD-MALTREATMENT-RESEARCH-L@cornell.edu by Postmaster@umbsky.cc.umb.edu follows.
Reason for rejection: message sent to the errors folder.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>From Postmaster@umbsky.cc.umb.edu Sat Aug 22 17:13:16 1998
Received: from cornell.edu (cornell.edu [132.236.56.6])
by listproc2.mail.cornell.edu (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id RAA16317
for <owner-child-maltreatment-research-l@listproc2.mail.cornell.edu>; Sat, 22 Aug 1998 17:13:16 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from daemon@localhost)
by cornell.edu (8.8.5/8.8.5) id RAA28111
for owner-child-maltreatment-research-l@listproc2.mail.cornell.edu; Sat, 22 Aug 1998 17:13:15 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from gemini.cc.umb.edu (gemini.cc.umb.edu [158.121.2.2])
by cornell.edu (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id RAA28078
for <owner-CHILD-MALTREATMENT-RESEARCH-L@cornell.edu>; Sat, 22 Aug 1998 17:13:13 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <199808222113.RAA28078@cornell.edu>
Date: Sat, 22 Aug 1998 17:14:35 EDT
X-PH: V4.1@cornell.edu (Cornell Modified)
From: Local delivery agent <Postmaster@umbsky.cc.umb.edu>
To: <owner-CHILD-MALTREATMENT-RESEARCH-L@cornell.edu>
Subject: LOCAL delivery error
X-Report-Type: Nondelivery; boundary="> Error description:"
Note: this message was generated automatically.
An error was detected while processing the enclosed message. A list of
the affected recipients follows. This list is in a special format that
allows software like LISTSERV to automatically take action on incorrect
addresses; you can safely ignore the numeric codes.
--> Error description:
Error-For: cdse@umbsky.cc.umb.edu
Error-Code: 3
Error-Text: No such local user
Error-End: 1 error detected
------------------------------ Rejected message ------------------------------
Received: from listproc2.mail.cornell.edu by gemini.cc.umb.edu (MX V4.2 VAX) with SMTP; Sat, 22 Aug 1998 17:14:33 EDT
Received: from localhost.mail.cornell.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by listproc2.mail.cornell.edu (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id QAA14589; Sat, 22 Aug 1998 16:35:08 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from cornell.edu (cornell.edu [132.236.56.6]) by listproc2.mail.cornell.edu (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id XAA23031 for <CHILD-MALTREATMENT-RESEARCH-L@listproc2.mail.cornell.edu>; Fri, 21 Aug 1998 23:21:08 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from daemon@localhost) by cornell.edu (8.8.5/8.8.5) id XAA10969 for CHILD-MALTREATMENT-RESEARCH-L@listproc2.mail.cornell.edu; Fri, 21 Aug 1998 23:21:07 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mtiwmhc02.worldnet.att.net (mtiwmhc02.worldnet.att.net [204.127.131.37]) by cornell.edu (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id XAA10959 for <CHILD-MALTREATMENT-RESEARCH-L@cornell.edu>; Fri, 21 Aug 1998 23:21:06 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from happy ([12.75.135.28]) by mtiwmhc02.worldnet.att.net (InterMail v03.02.03 118 118 102) with ESMTP id <19980822032105.GPMD15090@happy> for <CHILD-MALTREATMENT-RESEARCH-L@cornell.edu>; Sat, 22 Aug 1998 03:21:05 +0000
Message-ID: <19980822032105.GPMD15090@happy>
Date: Fri, 21 Aug 1998 22:21:54 -0500
Reply-To: <splisner@worldnet.att.net>
Sender: owner-CHILD-MALTREATMENT-RESEARCH-L@cornell.edu
Precedence: bulk
From: "Rachel Zilberman" <splisner@worldnet.att.net>
To: Child Maltreatment Researchers <CHILD-MALTREATMENT-RESEARCH-L@cornell.edu>
Subject: Re: Drug Testing in Child Protection Cases
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-To: <CHILD-MALTREATMENT-RESEARCH-L@cornell.edu>
X-PH: V4.1@cornell.edu (Cornell Modified)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Priority: 3
X-Mailer: Microsoft Internet Mail 4.70.1161
X-Listprocessor-Version: 7.2(a) -- ListProcessor by CREN
----------
> From: Jennifer Guimond <jguimond@niu.edu>
> To: Child Maltreatment Researchers
<CHILD-MALTREATMENT-RESEARCH-L@cornell.edu>
> Subject: Re: Drug Testing in Child Protection Cases
> Date: Thursday, August 20, 1998 11:47 PM
>
> I don't know much about the literature in child welfare cases, but in
terms of
> practice, children can be removed from parental custody if they test
positive
> for alcohol or drugs at birth. There have been arguments that action
should be
> taken against women who test positive during pregnancy, but to my
knowledge
> nothing but education ever actually takes place.
>
> Good Luck,
> Jennifer Guimond
That's true though there is no justification for it. Most studies show that
the alarmists concern on this issue is not justified by the data.
There may be other reasons for the children to be protected. However the
positive test alone is not one.
SimchaPlisner MSW JD