Children's Eyewitness Reports after Exposure to Misinformation from Parents,
1994-1995
Dataset Number: 88
Investigator(s): Debra A. Poole
Abstract: This study examined how misleading suggestions from
parents influenced children's eyewitness reports. A sample of 114
children (3 to 8 years old) participated in science demonstrations,
listened to their parents read a story that described experienced
and nonexperienced events, and subsequently discussed the science
experience in two follow-up interviews. Data include descriptive
information on the participants and their families, condition
assignments, and information about children’s responses to interview
questions during each of the three experimental sessions. In Session
1, immediately after exposure to the science demonstrations, the
children answered five open-ended questions about their experiences
with "Mr. Science." In Session 2, conducted in the children’s homes
approximately 3.5 months later and after parents read the misleading
story, each child answered (a) the same five open-ended questions as
in Session 1, (b) a set of ten direct yes-no questions (each
followed by a prompt to describe the event in question) and, (c)
open-ended and direct questions that asked the child to report which
events were described in the book and which events had really
happened during their visit to Mr. Science (i.e., the
source-monitoring procedure). Session 3 was a repetition of the
Session 2 interview after a 1-month delay with no further
intentional memory contamination.
Each child witnessed four science
demonstrations (from a set of eight demonstrations). For each child,
the misleading story described two science demonstrations that the
child witnessed, two novel science demonstrations, and one of two
descriptions of nonexperienced touching. Thus there are six
within-subject event conditions for each child: two demonstrations
that were experienced but not described in the story (i.e.,
experienced only events), two demonstrations that were experienced
and described in the story (i.e., experienced-heard events), two
demonstrations that were described in the story but not experienced
(i.e., heard-only events), two demonstrations that were neither
experienced or described in the story (i.e., control events), one
event involving nonexperienced touching that was described in the
story (i.e., a touch-heard event), and one touching event that was
not experienced or described in the story (i.e., a touch-control
event).
Download User's Guide (Data Codebook):
PDF
Download Poole and Lindsay's (2001) supplementary report: PDF

Back to List
Some portions of the user's guides consist of images and
may take some time to load. PDF (Portable Document Format) files
can be viewed and printed with Adobe Reader, a free utility
available at the Adobe
Web Site.